Addresses https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/15790
## Summary
After discussion, the functionality of `--project` vs `--directory` was
quite unclear in this case, so deprecating `--project` for `init` is
probably the clearest behavior option. This is a breaking change, so it
requires being under preview before being rolled out fully.
Included in the PR now:
- new feature flag (`init --project` is deprecated if `--preview` or
`--preview-features deprecate-project-for-init` are provided)
- tests (for `--directory` behavior, as well as the current warning and
future error)
- documentation updated in docs/concepts/projects/init.md
---------
Signed-off-by: Mikayla Thompson <mrt@mikayla.codes>
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
I am a new uv user and I was reading the docs to better understand the
project scope & best practices. The section on [signal
forwarding](https://docs.astral.sh/uv/concepts/projects/run/#signal-handling)
with `uv run` caught my eye because I've used tools that use SIGHUP to
trigger config reloads or SIGUSR1/2 to enable debugging/profiling/etc so
I was a little concerned about using a runner that might block those
signals. After some searching in issues/PRs, I found that this behavior
was actually [changed earlier this
year](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/13017) to forward additional
signals (awesome!) and thought I would update the docs and save the next
person/llm from thinking their tool won't work as expected if it uses
custom signal handling.
Thanks for all your great work!
P.S. If you think it makes more sense to explicitly list all forwarded
signals as opposed to just the exclusions, I'm happy to edit.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Corrects example command for generating pylock.toml from requirements.in
## Test Plan
Local preview
I specifically show more details than necessary in the example to make
it more clear that this is *NOT* the normal dependency-groups table.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
## Summary
Move the Resolver reference into a new Internals section in the
reference. Add the new nav item, fix internal linking to the new path,
fix server side redirect to the new path for external traffic via
redirect_maps, fix non existent anchor in
"docs/concepts/projects/dependencies.md"
Closes#15412
Zanie Blue