Part of https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4392
We shouldn't link to PyPI, and dropping the workspace-level
documentation link should mean that we get the auto-generated `docs.rs`
links.
Made to address this comment:
https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/16103#discussion_r2437498249
This PR sorts the distributions collected by
`FlatIndexClient::read_from_directory` (used for `--find-links`) so
results are ordered deterministically by filename and index.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Hey devs, great tool as always, you're doing amazing work.
## Summary
<!-- What's the purpose of the change? What does it do, and why? -->
Adds the following fields to the `[package]` table of `Cargo.toml` files
where they were missing:
```toml
rust-version = { workspace = true }
homepage = { workspace = true }
documentation = { workspace = true }
repository = { workspace = true }
authors = { workspace = true }
license = { workspace = true }
```
Most crates already had these fields, this just aligns the rest for
consistency.
This also resolves the warnings from `cargo-deny` when using `uv` crates
as dependencies in Pixi.
## Test Plan
No tests needed, this only updates metadata.
This PR is a combination of #12920 and #13754. Prior to these changes,
following a redirect when searching indexes would bypass our
authentication middleware. This PR updates uv to support propagating
credentials through our middleware on same-origin redirects and to
support netrc credentials for both same- and cross-origin redirects. It
does not handle the case described in #11097 where the redirect location
itself includes credentials (e.g.,
`https://user:pass@redirect-location.com`). That will be addressed in
follow-up work.
This includes unit tests for the new redirect logic and integration
tests for credential propagation. The automated external registries test
is also passing for AWS CodeArtifact, Azure Artifacts, GCP Artifact
Registry, JFrog Artifactory, GitLab, Cloudsmith, and Gemfury.
This PR redacts credentials in displayed URLs.
It mostly relies on a `redacted_url` function (and where possible
`IndexUrl::redacted`). This is a quick way to prevent leaked credentials
but it's prone to programmer error when adding new trace statements. A
better follow-on would use a `RedactedUrl` type with the appropriate
`Display` implementation. This would allow us to still extract
credentials from the URL while displaying it securely. On the plus side,
the sites where the `redacted_url` function are used serve as easy
signposts for where to use the new type in a future PR.
Closes#1714.
This PR restores #13041 and integrates two PRs from @zanieb:
* #13038
* #13040
It also adds tests for relative URI and fragment handling.
Closes#13037.
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
uv was failing to authenticate on 302 redirects when credentials were
available. This was because it was relying on `reqwest_middleware`'s
default redirect behavior which bypasses the middleware pipeline when
trying the redirect request (and hence bypasses our authentication
middleware). This PR updates uv to retrigger the middleware pipeline
when handling a 302 redirect, correctly using credentials from the URL,
the keyring, or `.netrc`.
Closes#5595Closes#11097
## Summary
This PR extends `[[tool.uv.index]]` to support `--find-links`-style
"flat" indexes, so that users can point to such indexes without using
`--find-links` _and_ get access to the full functionality of
`[[tool.uv.index]]` (e.g., they can now pin packages to
`--find-links`-style indexes).
Note that, at present, `--find-links` indexes actually have some quirky
behavior, in that we combine them into a single entity and then merge
the discovered distributions into each Simple API-style index. The
motivation here, IIRC, was to match pip's behavior quite closely. I'm
interested in _removing_ that behavior, but it'd be breaking (and may
also be inconvenient for some use-cases). So, the behavior for indexes
passed in via `--find-links` remains completely unchanged. However,
`[[tool.uv.index]]` entries with `format = "flat"` are now treated
identically to those defined with `format = "simple"` (the default), in
that we stop after we find the first-matching index, etc.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/11634.
## Summary
This is a prototype that I'm considering shipping under `--preview`,
based on [`light-the-torch`](https://github.com/pmeier/light-the-torch).
`light-the-torch` patches pip to pull PyTorch packages from the PyTorch
indexes automatically. And, in particular, `light-the-torch` will query
the installed CUDA drivers to determine which indexes are compatible
with your system.
This PR implements equivalent behavior under `--torch-backend auto`,
though you can also set `--torch-backend cpu`, etc. for convenience.
When enabled, the registry client will fetch from the appropriate
PyTorch index when it sees a package from the PyTorch ecosystem (and
ignore any other configured indexes, _unless_ the package is explicitly
pinned to a different index).
Right now, this is only implemented in the `uv pip` CLI, since it
doesn't quite fit into the lockfile APIs given that it relies on feature
detection on the currently-running machine.
## Test Plan
On macOS, you can test this with (e.g.):
```shell
UV_TORCH_BACKEND=auto UV_CUDA_DRIVER_VERSION=450.80.2 cargo run \
pip install torch --python-platform linux --python-version 3.12
```
On a GPU-enabled EC2 machine:
```shell
ubuntu@ip-172-31-47-149:~/uv$ UV_TORCH_BACKEND=auto cargo run pip install torch -v
Finished `dev` profile [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.31s
Running `target/debug/uv pip install torch -v`
DEBUG uv 0.6.6 (e95ca063b 2025-03-14)
DEBUG Searching for default Python interpreter in virtual environments
DEBUG Found `cpython-3.13.0-linux-x86_64-gnu` at `/home/ubuntu/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (virtual environment)
DEBUG Using Python 3.13.0 environment at: .venv
DEBUG Acquired lock for `.venv`
DEBUG At least one requirement is not satisfied: torch
warning: The `--torch-backend` setting is experimental and may change without warning. Pass `--preview` to disable this warning.
DEBUG Detected CUDA driver version from `/sys/module/nvidia/version`: 550.144.3
...
```
## Summary
This lets us drop a dependency entirely. `percent-encoding` is used by
`url` and so is already in the graph, whereas `urlencoding` isn't used
by anything else.
## Summary
This PR declares and documents all environment variables that are used
in one way or another in `uv`, either internally, or externally, or
transitively under a common struct.
I think over time as uv has grown there's been many environment
variables introduced. Its harder to know which ones exists, which ones
are missing, what they're used for, or where are they used across the
code. The docs only documents a handful of them, for others you'd have
to dive into the code and inspect across crates to know which crates
they're used on or where they're relevant.
This PR is a starting attempt to unify them, make it easier to discover
which ones we have, and maybe unlock future posibilities in automating
generating documentation for them.
I think we can split out into multiple structs later to better organize,
but given the high influx of PR's and possibly new environment variables
introduced/re-used, it would be hard to try to organize them all now
into their proper namespaced struct while this is all happening given
merge conflicts and/or keeping up to date.
I don't think this has any impact on performance as they all should
still be inlined, although it may affect local build times on changes to
the environment vars as more crates would likely need a rebuild. Lastly,
some of them are declared but not used in the code, for example those in
`build.rs`. I left them declared because I still think it's useful to at
least have a reference.
Did I miss any? Are their initial docs cohesive?
Note, `uv-static` is a terrible name for a new crate, thoughts? Others
considered `uv-vars`, `uv-consts`.
## Test Plan
Existing tests
As per
https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html
Before that, there were 91 separate integration tests binary.
(As discussed on Discord — I've done the `uv` crate, there's still a few
more commits coming before this is mergeable, and I want to see how it
performs in CI and locally).
Recently, rkyv 0.8 was released. Its API is a fair bit simpler now for
higher level uses (like for us in `uv`) and results in us being able to
delete a fair bit of code. This also removes our last dependency on `syn
1.0`, and thus drops that dependency.
Performance (via testing on the `transformers` example) seems to remain
about the same, which is what was expected:
```
$ hyperfine -w5 -r100 'uv lock' 'uv-ag-rkyv-update lock'
Benchmark 1: uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 55.6 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 30.4 ms, System: 35.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 43.0 ms … 73.1 ms 100 runs
Benchmark 2: uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
Time (mean ± σ): 56.5 ms ± 7.2 ms [User: 30.5 ms, System: 36.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 71.5 ms 100 runs
Summary
uv lock ran
1.02 ± 0.18 times faster than uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
```
Closes#7415
This is preparatory work for the upload functionality, which needs to
read the METADATA file and attach its parsed contents to the POST
request: We move finding the `.dist-info` from `install-wheel-rs` and
`uv-client` to a new `uv-metadata` crate, so it can be shared with the
publish crate.
I don't properly know if its the right place since the upload code isn't
ready, but i'm PR-ing it now because it already had merge conflicts.
This PR migrates uv's use of `chrono` to `jiff`.
I did most of this work a while back as one of my tests to ensure Jiff
could actually be used in a real world project. I decided to revive
this because I noticed that `reqwest-retry` dropped its Chrono
dependency,
which is I believe the only other thing requiring Chrono in uv.
(Although, we use a fork of `reqwest-middleware` at present, and that
hasn't been updated to latest upstream yet. I wasn't quite sure of the
process we have for that.)
In course of doing this, I actually made two changes to uv:
First is that the lock file now writes an RFC 3339 timestamp for
`exclude-newer`. Previously, we were using Chrono's `Display`
implementation for this which is a non-standard but "human readable"
format. I think the right thing to do here is an RFC 3339 timestamp.
Second is that, in addition to an RFC 3339 timestamp, `--exclude-newer`
used to accept a "UTC date." But this PR changes it to a "local date."
That is, a date in the user's system configured time zone. I think
this makes more sense than a UTC date, but one alternative is to drop
support for a date and just rely on an RFC 3339 timestamp. The main
motivation here is that automatically assuming UTC is often somewhat
confusing, since just writing an unqualified date like `2024-08-19` is
often assumed to be interpreted relative to the writer's "local" time.
We retry several kinds of network request failures, but it's often
unclear whether a request was retried or not
(https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/3514#issuecomment-2105485773).
This PR adds a small intermediary layer that logs all transient request
failures, adding the `DEBUG Transient request failure` lines:
```
DEBUG Searching for Python interpreter in virtual environments
DEBUG Found CPython 3.12.3 at `/home/konsti/projects/uv/.venv/bin/python3` (active virtual environment)
DEBUG Using Python 3.12.3 environment at .venv/bin/python3
DEBUG Acquired lock for `.venv`
DEBUG At least one requirement is not satisfied: tqdm
DEBUG Using registry request timeout of 30s
DEBUG Solving with target Python version 3.12.3
DEBUG Adding direct dependency: tqdm*
DEBUG No cache entry for: https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/
DEBUG Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/, retrying: Request error: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
DEBUG Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/, retrying: Request error: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
DEBUG Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/, retrying: Request error: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
DEBUG Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/, retrying: Request error: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
error: Could not connect, are you offline?
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
```
I decided for multi-line logging to show the complete error trace since
only `Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/,
retrying: Request error: error sending request for url
(https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)` doesn't tell you the actual problem (a
dns error).
Note that running with `-v` will not show messages about retry backoff
timing, but running with `RUST_LOG=debug` now shows a complete picture:
```
DEBUG starting new connection: https://pypi.org/
DEBUG resolving host="pypi.org"
DEBUG Transient request failure for https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/, retrying: Request error: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: error sending request for url (https://pypi.org/simple/tqdm/)
Caused by: client error (Connect)
Caused by: dns error: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
Caused by: failed to lookup address information: Name or service not known
WARN Retry attempt #2. Sleeping 528.728192ms before the next attempt
```
Fixes#3572
In *some* places in our crates, `serde` (and `rkyv`) are optional
dependencies. I believe this was done out of reasons of "good sense,"
that is, it follows a Rust ecosystem pattern where serde integration
tends to be an opt-in crate feature. (And similarly for `rkyv`.)
However, ultimately, `uv` itself requires `serde` and `rkyv` to
function. Since our crates are strictly internal, there are limited
consumers for our crates without `serde` (and `rkyv`) enabled. I think
one possibility is that optional `serde` (and `rkyv`) integration means
that someone can do this:
cargo test -p pep440_rs
And this will run tests _without_ `serde` or `rkyv` enabled. That in
turn could lead to faster iteration time by reducing compile times. But,
I'm not sure this is worth supporting. The iterative compilation times
of
individual crates are probably fast enough in debug mode, even with
`serde` and `rkyv` enabled. Namely, `serde` and `rkyv` themselves
shouldn't need to be re-compiled in most cases. On `main`:
```
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.685
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --lib` 0.278s
from-scratch: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 3.948s
incremental: `cargo test -p pep440_rs --features serde,rkyv --lib` 0.321s
```
So while a from-scratch build does take significantly longer, an
incremental build is about the same.
The benefit of doing this change is two-fold:
1. It brings out crates into alignment with "reality." In particular,
some crates were _implicitly_ relying on `serde` being enabled
without explicitly declaring it. This technically means that our
`Cargo.toml`s were wrong in some cases, but it is hard to observe it
because of feature unification in a Cargo workspace.
2. We no longer need to deal with the cognitive burden of writing
`#[cfg_attr(feature = "serde", ...)]` everywhere.
Previously, uv-auth would fail to compile due to a missing process
feature. I chose to make all tokio features we use top level features,
so we can share the tokio cache between all test invocations.
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Closes#2564
## Test Plan
1. Changed existing linehaul tests to leverage insta.
2. Ran tests in various linux distros (Debian, Ubuntu, Centos, Fedora,
Alpine) to ensure they also pass locally again.
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
This PR adds support for hash-checking mode in `pip install` and `pip
sync`. It's a large change, both in terms of the size of the diff and
the modifications in behavior, but it's also one that's hard to merge in
pieces (at least, with any test coverage) since it needs to work
end-to-end to be useful and testable.
Here are some of the most important highlights:
- We store hashes in the cache. Where we previously stored pointers to
unzipped wheels in the `archives` directory, we now store pointers with
a set of known hashes. So every pointer to an unzipped wheel also
includes its known hashes.
- By default, we don't compute any hashes. If the user runs with
`--require-hashes`, and the cache doesn't contain those hashes, we
invalidate the cache, redownload the wheel, and compute the hashes as we
go. For users that don't run with `--require-hashes`, there will be no
change in performance. For users that _do_, the only change will be if
they don't run with `--generate-hashes` -- then they may see some
repeated work between resolution and installation, if they use `pip
compile` then `pip sync`.
- Many of the distribution types now include a `hashes` field, like
`CachedDist` and `LocalWheel`.
- Our behavior is similar to pip, in that we enforce hashes when pulling
any remote distributions, and when pulling from our own cache. Like pip,
though, we _don't_ enforce hashes if a distribution is _already_
installed.
- Hash validity is enforced in a few different places:
1. During resolution, we enforce hash validity based on the hashes
reported by the registry. If we need to access a source distribution,
though, we then enforce hash validity at that point too, prior to
running any untrusted code. (This is enforced in the distribution
database.)
2. In the install plan, we _only_ add cached distributions that have
matching hashes. If a cached distribution is missing any hashes, or the
hashes don't match, we don't return them from the install plan.
3. In the downloader, we _only_ return distributions with matching
hashes.
4. The final combination of "things we install" are: (1) the wheels from
the cache, and (2) the downloaded wheels. So this ensures that we never
install any mismatching distributions.
- Like pip, if `--require-hashes` is provided, we require that _all_
distributions are pinned with either `==` or a direct URL. We also
require that _all_ distributions have hashes.
There are a few notable TODOs:
- We don't support hash-checking mode for unnamed requirements. These
should be _somewhat_ rare, though? Since `pip compile` never outputs
unnamed requirements. I can fix this, it's just some additional work.
- We don't automatically enable `--require-hashes` with a hash exists in
the requirements file. We require `--require-hashes`.
Closes#474.
## Test Plan
I'd like to add some tests for registries that report incorrect hashes,
but otherwise: `cargo test`
## Summary
This lets us remove circular dependencies (in the future, e.g., #2945)
that arise from `FlatIndex` needing a bunch of resolver-specific
abstractions (like incompatibilities, required hashes, etc.) that aren't
necessary to _fetch_ the flat index entries.
Zanie Blue