## Summary
This PR is like #957, but for validating the virtual environment, rather
than the cache. So, if you have a local wheel, and you rebuild it, we'll
now correctly uninstall and reinstall it in the virtual environment.
## Summary
This is a small correctness improvement that ensures that we avoid using
stale cache entries for local dependencies in the install plan. We
already have some logic like this in the source distribution builder,
but it didn't apply in the install plan, and so we'd end up using stale
wheels.
Specifically, now, if you create a new local wheel, and run `pip sync`,
we'll mark the cache entries as stale and make sure we unzip it and
install it. (If the wheel is _already_ installed, we won't reinstall it
though, which will be a separate change. This is just about reading from
the cache, not the environment.)
The `InstallPlan` does a lot of work in the constructor, which I tend to
feel is an anti-pattern. With cache refresh, it's also going to need to
be made `async`, so it really feels like it should be a clearer method
rather than an async, fallible constructor that does a bunch of IO. This
PR splits into a `Planner` (with a `build` method) and a `Plan`.
## Summary
This PR uses a single `Index` that's shared between the top-level
resolver and any sub-resolutions happen in the course of that top-level
resolution (namely, to resolve build dependencies for any source
distributions).
In theory it's an optimization, since (e.g.) if we have two packages
that both need the `flit-core` build system, and we attempt to build
them both at once, we'll only fetch its metadata _once_, and share it
across the two resolutions. In practice, I haven't been able to get this
to show up in benchmarks. I suspect you'd need a _lot_ of source
distributions for it to matter... Though it may still be worth doing, it
strikes me as a cleaner design.
Closes#200.
Closes#541.
## Summary
This fixes an extremely subtle bug in `pip install --reinstall`, whereby
if you depend on `setuptools` at the top level, we end up uninstalling
it after resolving, which breaks some cached state. If we have
`--reinstall`, we need to reset that cached state between resolving and
installing.
## Test Plan
Running `pip install --reinstall` with:
```txt
setuptools
devpi @ https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/e4/f3/e334eb4dc930ccb677363e1305a3730003d203efbb023329e4b610e4515b/devpi-2.2.0.tar.gz
```
Fails on `main`, but passes.
## Summary
This PR fixes a subtle bug in `pip install` when using `--reinstall`. If
a package depends on a build system directly (e.g., `waitress` depends
on `setuptools`), and then you have other packages that also need the
build system to build a source distribution, right now, we don't share
the `OnceMap` between those cases.
This lifts the `InFlight` tracking up a level, so that it's initialized
once per command, then shared everywhere.
## Test Plan
I'm having trouble coming up with an identical test-case and hesitant to
add this slow test to the suite... But if you run `pip install
--reinstall` with:
```
waitress @ git+https://github.com/zanieb/waitress
devpi-server @ git+https://github.com/zanieb/devpi#subdirectory=server
```
It fails consistently on `main` and passes here.
## Summary
This makes the separation clearer between the legacy `pip` API and the
API we'll add in the future for the package manager itself. It also
enables seamless `puffin pip` aliasing for those that want it.
Closes#918.
## Summary
This PR restructures the flat index fetching in a few ways:
1. It now lives in its own `FlatIndexClient`, since it felt a bit
awkward (in my opinion) for it to live in `RegistryClient`.
2. We now fetch the `FlatIndex` outside of the resolver. This has a few
benefits: (1) the resolver construct is no longer `async` and no longer
returns `Result`, which feels better for a resolver; and (2) we can
share the `FlatIndex` across resolutions rather than re-fetching it for
every source distribution build.
## Summary
`FlatIndex` is now the thing that's keyed on `PackageName`, while
`FlatDistributions` is what used to be called `FlatIndex` (a map from
version to `PrioritizedDistribution`, for a single package). I find this
a bit clearer, since we can also remove the `from_files` that doesn't
return `Self`, which I had trouble following.
Add directory `--find-links` support for local paths to pip-compile.
It seems that pip joins all sources and then picks the best package. We
explicitly give find links packages precedence if the same exists on an
index and locally by prefilling the `VersionMap`, otherwise they are
added as another index and the existing rules of precedence apply.
Internally, the feature is called _flat index_, which is more meaningful
than _find links_: We're not looking for links, we're picking up local
directories, and (TBD) support another index format that's just a flat
list of files instead of a nested index.
`RegistryBuiltDist` and `RegistrySourceDist` now use `WheelFilename` and
`SourceDistFilename` respectively. The `File` inside `RegistryBuiltDist`
and `RegistrySourceDist` gained the ability to represent both a url and
a path so that `--find-links` with a url and with a path works the same,
both being locked as `<package_name>@<version>` instead of
`<package_name> @ <url>`. (This is more of a detail, this PR in general
still work if we strip that and have directory find links represented as
`<package_name> @ file:///path/to/file.ext`)
`PrioritizedDistribution` and `FlatIndex` have been moved to locations
where we can use them in the upstack PR.
I added a `scripts/wheels` directory with stripped down wheels to use
for testing.
We're lacking tests for correct tag priority precedence with flat
indexes, i only confirmed this manually since it is not covered in the
pip-compile or pip-sync output.
Closes#876
## Summary
This PR ensures that when the user passes in `--python-version`, we
adjust the _markers_ to match the target version, thus forcing us to
select compatible wheels for the `--python-version`, rather than the
installed version.
## Context
Let's call Python 3.10 the "installed" environment and Python 3.12 the
"target" environment. For each version, we have _both_ a Python version
(to match against `Requires-Python`) and a set of tags (to match against
wheels).
The rules for resolution are as follows...
- For each package, for each version, we try to find the "best
candidate" for resolution and installation.
- We first look for a wheel that's compatible with the _target_
environment. This requires testing against both the `Requires-Python`
and the markers. (We won't have to build or run this code, so the
_installed_ version is irrelevant.) **(This PR corrects _this_ bullet --
previously, we validated against the _installed_ markers, rather than
the target markers.)**
- If we can't find a compatible wheel, we accept any _incompatible_
wheel as long as there's a source distribution. The source distribution
_must_ be compatible with the target environment. (We won't have to
build or run this code, so the _installed_ version is irrelevant.)
- If there are no wheels, then the source distribution must be
compatible with _both_ the installed and target environments, since we
need to build it.
This is all true for the top-level resolution. When we perform a
sub-resolution (when resolving the build dependencies of a source
distribution), we should _only_ use the installed environment, and
ignore the target environment, since we assume that the dependencies
will be the same in both environments once built -- so our goal is
"just" to build the distribution, without concern for which build
dependencies it uses.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/883.
Remove a test case from the `install_editable` that slows it down from
3.6s to 6.5s while providing low test coverage. It also seems to block
other tests sometimes, `cargo nextest run -E "test(editable)"
--all-features` has more consistent and lower runtimes. Surprisingly
this seems to have bigger effect than switching from pyo3 to cffi.
Used test commands:
```
rm -rf scripts/editable-installs/maturin_editable/target/ && time cargo nextest run -E "test(=install_editable)" --all-features
rm -rf scripts/editable-installs/maturin_editable/target/ && time cargo nextest run -E "test(editable)" --all-features
```
Part of #878
Replace the DTLSsocket test with a dummy package that does nothing but
contain the build system specs that we need. This should speed up one of
the slowest tests.
Part of #878
Reduces the number of implementation branches handling `Range:full`,
deferring it to `PackageRange`.
Improves some user-facing messages, e.g. saying `all versions of
<package>` instead of `<package>*`.
Changes the member names of the `PackageRangeKind` enum — they were not
very clear.
## Summary
Installs the seed packages you get with `virtualenv`, but opt-in rather
than opt-out.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/852.
## Test Plan
```
❯ ./scripts/benchmarks/venv.sh
+ hyperfine --runs 20 --warmup 3 --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' './target/release/puffin venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'virtualenv --without-pip .venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'python -m venv --without-pip .venv'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/puffin venv
Time (mean ± σ): 4.6 ms ± 0.2 ms [User: 2.4 ms, System: 3.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 4.3 ms … 4.9 ms 20 runs
Warning: Command took less than 5 ms to complete. Note that the results might be inaccurate because hyperfine can not calibrate the shell startup time much more precise than this limit. You can try to use the `-N`/`--shell=none` option to disable the shell completely.
Benchmark 2: virtualenv --without-pip .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 73.3 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 57.4 ms, System: 14.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 72.8 ms … 74.0 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 3: python -m venv --without-pip .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 22.5 ms ± 0.3 ms [User: 17.0 ms, System: 4.9 ms]
Range (min … max): 22.0 ms … 23.2 ms 20 runs
Summary
'./target/release/puffin venv' ran
4.92 ± 0.20 times faster than 'python -m venv --without-pip .venv'
16.00 ± 0.63 times faster than 'virtualenv --without-pip .venv'
+ hyperfine --runs 20 --warmup 3 --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' './target/release/puffin venv --seed' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'virtualenv .venv' --prepare 'rm -rf .venv' 'python -m venv .venv'
Benchmark 1: ./target/release/puffin venv --seed
Time (mean ± σ): 20.2 ms ± 0.4 ms [User: 8.6 ms, System: 15.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 19.7 ms … 21.2 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 2: virtualenv .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 135.1 ms ± 2.4 ms [User: 66.7 ms, System: 65.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 133.2 ms … 142.8 ms 20 runs
Benchmark 3: python -m venv .venv
Time (mean ± σ): 1.656 s ± 0.014 s [User: 1.447 s, System: 0.186 s]
Range (min … max): 1.641 s … 1.697 s 20 runs
Summary
'./target/release/puffin venv --seed' ran
6.67 ± 0.17 times faster than 'virtualenv .venv'
81.79 ± 1.70 times faster than 'python -m venv .venv'
```
## Summary
Our current setup uses the legacy `setup.py`-based builds if a
`pyproject.toml` file isn't present. This matches pip's behavior.
However, `pypa/build` uses PEP 517-based builds in such cases, and it
looks like pip plans to make that the default
(https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/9175), with the limiting factor
being performance issues related to isolated builds.
This is now the default behavior, but the `--legacy-setup-py` flag
allows users to opt-in to using `setup.py` directly for distributions
that lack a `pyproject.toml`.
## Summary
This PR adds support for `prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel`, which
allows us to determine source distribution metadata without building the
source distribution. This represents an optimization for the resolver,
as we can skip the expensive build phase for build backends that support
it.
For reference, `prepare_metadata_for_build_wheel` seems to be supported
by:
- `hatchling` (as of
[1.0.9](https://hatch.pypa.io/latest/history/hatchling/#hatchling-v1.9.0)).
- `flit`
- `setuptools`
In fact, it seems to work for every backend _except_ those using legacy
`setup.py`.
Closes#599.
## Summary
If pre-releases are available for a package that we otherwise couldn't
resolve, we now show a hint that includes one of the example versions.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/811.
Adjusts display of "no versions available" in error messages to be
consistent with other package/range pairings i.e. we usually display
"<package-name><range>".
## Summary
I'm unable to run `puffin-cli` on `main` as the
`tracing-durations-export` is marked as optional, but the crate actually
depends on it to compile. Further, without `tracing-durations-export`,
there are `Option` types that can't resolve to a concrete type.
This PR fixes compilation with and without the feature.
In the past, I moved us to `owo-colors`
(https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/pull/121); then, we moved back,
because we ran into issues with overriding the settings to force-disable
colors. But `anstream` solved those problems, so I'm moving us _back_ to
`owo-colors`, since it's what `anstream` recommends, and it's already
used by many of our dependencies (`miette`, `configparser`).
---------
Co-authored-by: konstin <konstin@mailbox.org>
## Summary
We can use `anstream` for all color control, rather than going through
`colored`. Note that we still need the `colored` crate, since `colored`
and `anstream` solve different problems. (`anstream` recommends using
`owo-colors` alongside it, but `colored` seems to work fine?)
Resolves the issue raised in
https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/pull/742 via `anstream` rather than
`colored`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/puffin/issues/782.
This PR builds on #780 by making both version parsing faster, and
perhaps more importantly, making version comparisons much faster.
Overall, these changes result in a considerable improvement for the
`boto3.in` workload. Here's the status quo:
```
$ time puffin pip-compile --no-build --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/requirements/boto3.in
Resolved 31 packages in 34.56s
real 34.579
user 34.004
sys 0.413
maxmem 2867 MB
faults 0
```
And now with this PR:
```
$ time puffin pip-compile --no-build --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/requirements/boto3.in
Resolved 31 packages in 9.20s
real 9.218
user 8.919
sys 0.165
maxmem 463 MB
faults 0
```
This particular workload gets stuck in pubgrub doing resolution, and
thus benefits mightily from a faster `Version::cmp` routine. With that
said, this change does also help a fair bit with "normal" runs:
```
$ hyperfine -w10 \
"puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in" \
"puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in"
Benchmark 1: puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
Time (mean ± σ): 337.5 ms ± 3.9 ms [User: 310.5 ms, System: 73.2 ms]
Range (min … max): 333.6 ms … 343.4 ms 10 runs
Benchmark 2: puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
Time (mean ± σ): 189.8 ms ± 3.0 ms [User: 168.1 ms, System: 78.4 ms]
Range (min … max): 185.0 ms … 196.2 ms 15 runs
Summary
puffin-cmparc pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in ran
1.78 ± 0.03 times faster than puffin-base pip-compile --cache-dir ~/astral/tmp/cache/ -o /dev/null ./scripts/benchmarks/requirements.in
```
There is perhaps some future work here (detailed in the commit
messages), but I suspect it would be more fruitful to explore ways of
making resolution itself and/or deserialization faster.
Fixes#373, Closes#396
Charlie Marsh