<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
Closes#4653
## Summary
Adds the tool version to the list command right beside the tool name
```
$ uv tool list
black v24.2.0
```
Following the proposed format discussed in #4653
## Test Plan
`cargo test tool_list`
<!-- How was it tested? -->
---------
Co-authored-by: Zanie Blue <contact@zanie.dev>
Whew this is a lot.
The user-facing changes are:
- `uv toolchain` to `uv python` e.g. `uv python find`, `uv python
install`, ...
- `UV_TOOLCHAIN_DIR` to` UV_PYTHON_INSTALL_DIR`
- `<UV_STATE_DIR>/toolchains` to `<UV_STATE_DIR>/python` (with
[automatic
migration](https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/pull/4735/files#r1663029330))
- User-facing messages no longer refer to toolchains, instead using
"Python", "Python versions" or "Python installations"
The internal changes are:
- `uv-toolchain` crate to `uv-python`
- `Toolchain` no longer referenced in type names
- Dropped unused `SystemPython` type (previously replaced)
- Clarified the type names for "managed Python installations"
- (more little things)
## Summary
For now the semantics are such that if the requested requirements from
the command line don't match the receipt (or if any `--reinstall` or
`--upgrade` is requested), we proceed with an install, passing the
`--reinstall` and `--upgrade` to the underlying Python environment.
This may lead to some unintuitive behaviors, but it's simplest for now.
For example:
- `uv tool install black<24` followed by `uv tool install black
--upgrade` will install the latest version of `black`, removing the
`<24` constraint.
- `uv tool install black --with black-plugin` followed by `uv tool
install black` will remove `black-plugin`.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4659.
## Summary
Packages that provide scripts that _aren't_ Python entrypoints need to
respected in `uv tool install`. For example, Ruff ships a script in
`ruff-0.5.0.data/scripts`.
Unfortunately, the `.data` directory doesn't exist in the virtual
environment at all (it's removed, per the spec, after install). So this
PR changes the entry point detection to look at the `RECORD` file, which
is the only evidence that the scripts were installed.
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/4691.
## Test Plan
`cargo run uv tool install ruff` (snapshot tests to-come)
We need this to power uninstallations!
The latter two commits were reviewed in:
- #4637
- #4638
Note this is a breaking change for existing tool installations, but it's
in preview and very new. In the future, we'll need a clear upgrade path
for tool receipt changes.
Adds support for `--reinstall` and `--reinstall-package` to `uv tool
install`. These are already available via the installer settings, we
just respect them now.
`--reinstall` implies a recreation of the environment and reinstallation
of the entry points.
`--reinstall-package` will only update a subset of the environment. If
the target package is the one with the entry points, we'll reinstall the
entry points. Otherwise, the entry points are not changed.
This is the minimal "working" implementation. In summary, we:
- Resolve the requested requirements
- Create an environment at `$UV_STATE_DIR/tools/$name`
- Inspect the `dist-info` for the main requirement to determine its
entry points scripts
- Link the entry points from a user-executable directory
(`$XDG_BIN_HOME`) to the environment bin
- Create an entry at `$UV_STATE_DIR/tools/tools.toml` tracking the
user's request
The idea with `tools.toml` is that it allows us to perform upgrades and
syncs, retaining the original user request (similar to declarations in a
`pyproject.toml`). I imagine using a similar schema in the
`pyproject.toml` in the future if/when we add project-levle tools. I'm
also considering exposing `tools.toml` in the standard uv configuration
directory instead of the state directory, but it seems nice to tuck it
away for now while we iterate on it. Installing a tool won't perform a
sync of other tool environments, we'll probably have an explicit `uv
tool sync` command for that?
I've split out todos into follow-up pull requests:
- #4509 (failing on Windows)
- #4501
- #4504Closes#4485
Caíque Porfirio