## Summary
A lot of good new lints, and most importantly, error stabilizations. I
tried to find a few usages of the new stabilizations, but I'm sure there
are more.
IIUC, this _does_ require bumping our MSRV.
## Summary
These were moved as part of a broader refactor to create a single
integration test module. That "single integration test module" did
indeed have a big impact on compile times, which is great! But we aren't
seeing any benefit from moving these tests into their own files (despite
the claim in [this blog
post](https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html),
I see the same compilation pattern regardless of where the tests are
located). Plus, we don't have many of these, and same-file tests is such
a strong Rust convention.
This still utilizes the RFC 2822 datetime formatter, but utilizes new
methods [added in jiff 0.1.14] to emit timestamps in a format strictly
compatible with RFC 9110.
It seems like most HTTP servers were pretty flexible and supported RFC
2822 datetime formats, but #8747 shows at least one case where that
isn't true. Given that the [MDN docs prescribe RFC 9110], we defer to
them.
Fixes#8747
[added in jiff 0.1.14]: https://github.com/BurntSushi/jiff/pull/154
[MDN docs prescribe RFC 9110]:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/If-Modified-Since
As per
https://matklad.github.io/2021/02/27/delete-cargo-integration-tests.html
Before that, there were 91 separate integration tests binary.
(As discussed on Discord — I've done the `uv` crate, there's still a few
more commits coming before this is mergeable, and I want to see how it
performs in CI and locally).
Recently, rkyv 0.8 was released. Its API is a fair bit simpler now for
higher level uses (like for us in `uv`) and results in us being able to
delete a fair bit of code. This also removes our last dependency on `syn
1.0`, and thus drops that dependency.
Performance (via testing on the `transformers` example) seems to remain
about the same, which is what was expected:
```
$ hyperfine -w5 -r100 'uv lock' 'uv-ag-rkyv-update lock'
Benchmark 1: uv lock
Time (mean ± σ): 55.6 ms ± 6.4 ms [User: 30.4 ms, System: 35.1 ms]
Range (min … max): 43.0 ms … 73.1 ms 100 runs
Benchmark 2: uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
Time (mean ± σ): 56.5 ms ± 7.2 ms [User: 30.5 ms, System: 36.3 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 71.5 ms 100 runs
Summary
uv lock ran
1.02 ± 0.18 times faster than uv-ag-rkyv-update lock
```
Closes#7415
This PR migrates uv's use of `chrono` to `jiff`.
I did most of this work a while back as one of my tests to ensure Jiff
could actually be used in a real world project. I decided to revive
this because I noticed that `reqwest-retry` dropped its Chrono
dependency,
which is I believe the only other thing requiring Chrono in uv.
(Although, we use a fork of `reqwest-middleware` at present, and that
hasn't been updated to latest upstream yet. I wasn't quite sure of the
process we have for that.)
In course of doing this, I actually made two changes to uv:
First is that the lock file now writes an RFC 3339 timestamp for
`exclude-newer`. Previously, we were using Chrono's `Display`
implementation for this which is a non-standard but "human readable"
format. I think the right thing to do here is an RFC 3339 timestamp.
Second is that, in addition to an RFC 3339 timestamp, `--exclude-newer`
used to accept a "UTC date." But this PR changes it to a "local date."
That is, a date in the user's system configured time zone. I think
this makes more sense than a UTC date, but one alternative is to drop
support for a date and just rely on an RFC 3339 timestamp. The main
motivation here is that automatically assuming UTC is often somewhat
confusing, since just writing an unqualified date like `2024-08-19` is
often assumed to be interpreted relative to the writer's "local" time.
## Summary
The strategy here is: if the user provides supported environments, we
use those as the initial forks when resolving. As a result, we never add
or explore branches that are disjoint with the supported environments.
(If the supported environments change, we ignore the lockfile entirely,
so we don't have to worry about any interactions between supported
environments and the preference forks.)
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/6184.
The comment in the code explains the bulk of this:
```rust
// We previously computed this heuristic freshness lifetime by
// looking at the difference between the last modified header and
// the response's date header. We then asserted that the cached
// response ought to be "fresh" for 10% of that interval.
//
// It turns out that this can result in very long freshness
// lifetimes[1] that lead to uv caching too aggressively.
//
// Since PyPI sets a max-age of 600 seconds and since we're
// principally just interacting with Python package indices here,
// we just assume a freshness lifetime equal to what PyPI has.
//
// Note though that a better solution here is for the index to
// support proper HTTP caching headers (ideally Cache-Control, but
// Expires also works too, as above).
```
We also remove the `heuristic_percent` field on `CacheConfig`. Since
that's actually part of the cache itself, we bump the simple cache
version.
Finally, we add some more `trace!` calls that should hopefully make
diagnosing issues related to the freshness lifetime a bit easier in the
future.
Fixes#5351
<!--
Thank you for contributing to uv! To help us out with reviewing, please
consider the following:
- Does this pull request include a summary of the change? (See below.)
- Does this pull request include a descriptive title?
- Does this pull request include references to any relevant issues?
-->
## Summary
Just fix typos.
While `alpha-numeric` is not really a misspelling:
- it is missing from mainstream curated dictionaries, all of them
suggest `alphanumeric`;
- it is less used than `alphanumeric` (more than ⨉10 less) according to
the Google [Ngram
Viewer](https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=alpha-numeric%2Calphanumeric&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019);
- it is [missing from
SCOWL](http://app.aspell.net/lookup?dict=en_US-large;words=alpha-numeric).
## Test Plan
CI jobs.
## Summary
We're seeing reports that Sonatype Nexus isn't working with cached data.
Users are reporting 304 responses that show "Found modified response..."
path in the logs. I can't reproduce this on latest Sonatype Nexus, but
my best guess is that there's a 304 response that is failing our
validators, and we try to use that as if it's a "complete" response?
Closes https://github.com/astral-sh/uv/issues/1754.
Address a few pedantic lints
lints are separated into separate commits so they can be reviewed
individually.
I've not added enforcement for any of these lints, but that could be
added if desirable.
First, replace all usages in files in-place. I used my editor for this.
If someone wants to add a one-liner that'd be fun.
Then, update directory and file names:
```
# Run twice for nested directories
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
find . -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
# Update files
find . -type f -print0 | xargs -0 rename s/puffin/uv/g
```
Then add all the files again
```
# Add all the files again
git add crates
git add python/uv
# This one needs a force-add
git add -f crates/uv-trampoline
```
Zanie Blue